Blogs

Read and comment on our members blogs.

Options

My Options
Things you can do.

My Blogs
Manage my blogs.

 
Emma Soames

Joan Bakewell on paying for care

By: Emma Soames
On: 27 Jul 2010 at 11:03
Why not log in and add your recommendation?

More than 25 per cent of the population will be over 65 in 20 years' time, three in four people will need care towards the end of our lives and only one council out of ten has made provision for this growing demographic. Joan Bakewell’s report for Panorama this week showed the good, the bad and the ugliest of scenarios that await us. It was also a timely reminder of the huge challenge that care for the elderly represents in this country.

The coalition government has postponed a decision to the crucial but highly controversial question of how social care is to be funded in future. At present in Scotland personal care is free but the costs are set to double over the next 15 years. In England large numbers of people end up having to sell their homes to pay for their care, which is of course wildly unpopular; but as Panorama pointed out, many of this generation of baby-boomers will be wealthier than the young tax payers who would have to foot the bill if the state picked up all the costs.

Is it fair to expect one generation to pay for the care in old age of their parents and grandparents? By 2060 there will only be two people working for every one retired - an unsustainable burden on taxpayers. Meanwhile those needing care now or over the next few years are faced with paying for their own care, which can cost at least £500 a week, or relying on local authorities whose budgets are subject to draconian cuts.

There is a major issue of fairness at stake here. The solution will not please everyone, but clarity, when it finally comes, will at least ease the serious worries that beset older people as we contemplate how we are going to pay for the care that most of us are going to need. The solution lies probably in a mixed payment - individuals making a contribution to their care costs and the state topping it up. But we will have to wait another year for the government's new Commission to report and in the meantime thousands more will need care under the present muddled and occasionally very unfair system. But as Dame Joan said: "The baby-boomers are not going to sit quietly in the corner and be told to take their tablets."

This blog has received 11 comments
Comments have been disabled on this blog.
Re: Joan Bakewell on paying for care
By Kangapuss On: 27 Jul 2010 11:29
Hello Emma,

This is one baby boomer who will not "take her tablets" quietly.
I intend to kick up my heels and spend my childrens inheritance on fun, wild men and possibly if my hips allow it rock and roll.


Kangapuss.
Re: Joan Bakewell on paying for care
By fat margot On: 27 Jul 2010 12:09
wow, gill move over, im coming with you. i have been living painfully under the poverty line for too many years, and now i have a little extra money for being a cancer patient. i am still careful with the little extra that i have, but i predicted a long time ago that there wouldnt be enough money for the likes of me when i pass the ageline to frailty. i can see many people like me dying home alone without any care. when i was diagnosed with cancer, the macmillan nurse refused to come and see me as she had too many people to see already. these country places suffer terribly the further you get from london. so, what you are saying is no surprise to me. i have no-one near to look after me, although i looked after my mother and father till they died. the trouble with this country is that like the children nowadays, they pass the responsibility to someone else and then sit and moan. i never did. i saw it as my christian duty, and also love for my parents to exercise the last things i could do for them. vis a vis family should take care of family.

topped up with a little help where necessary.
Re: Joan Bakewell on paying for care
By Little Wol On: 27 Jul 2010 19:53
Just been on a cruise and was not surprised to see how many passengers on their 2nd or 3rd cruise of the year declared themselves SKI-ers (Spending Kids' Inheritance.) Spend it before the state gets it was their mantra and can you blame them?

There has always been a problem at the core of the welfare state and that does relate to fairness. Take a cautious approach to life, save for a rainy day and get no support from the srvices to which you have contibuted all your life. (They did call it 'national insurance' after all). Then see people who spent it before they'd earned it get all the help they need. Fair? I think not.

For me, it started on a scout trip on a hot day to visit the Jamboree. The leaders discovered that some boys were 'not prepared' as scouts should have been and had come along without any drinks. They were provided with bottles of fizzy pop (then a real treat). The rest of us were told to drink the weak and warm orange squash our parents had provided. It has been the same ever since.

Three letter word for National Insurance? TAX. Come on you politicians. You have known about the demographoic figures for decades. Don't blame the baby boomers for the cowardice of your predecessors.
Next » 
1 2 3 4
 
Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions © COPYRIGHT SAGA